H.R. 9216

H.R. 9216: To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to adjust the rate employers pay for overtime hours from one and one-half to two times the regular rate.

Introduced Gregorio Casar (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9216 proposes to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase the overtime pay rate for employees from one and a half times their regular pay to double their regular pay for hours worked beyond the standard 40-hour workweek. This change aims to provide greater financial compensation for workers who put in extra hours.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9216 argue that increasing the overtime pay rate will help workers better cope with rising living costs and provide them with a fairer compensation for their hard work. Advocates believe this change will encourage employers to hire more staff rather than overworking current employees, potentially leading to job creation.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9216 warn that raising the overtime pay rate could impose significant financial burdens on businesses, particularly small enterprises. They argue that this could lead to reduced hiring, increased prices for consumers, and potential layoffs as employers adjust to the higher costs associated with overtime pay.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Labor and Employment

While there are no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries, the lobbying activity in the policy area raises some concerns. Several companies involved in lobbying, such as Samsara Inc. and Paysafe Merchant Services Corporation, operate in sectors that could be affected by changes to overtime pay regulations. Although the specific dollar amounts from these lobbying efforts are undisclosed, the presence of multiple lobbying firms suggests a potential influence on the legislative process. Voters should be aware that while the sponsor may not have direct financial ties to industries impacted by the bill, the lobbying landscape indicates that interests may still be at play that could affect the outcome of this legislation.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY RMP STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
MANAGED FUNDS ASSOCIATION RMP STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
PUBLIC PRIVATE STRATEGIES VALENTINE STRATEGIES undisclosed
SAMSARA INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. undisclosed
OTG PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
BLOCKQUAKE HOLDINGS LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
PAYSAFE MERCHANT SERVICES CORPORATION PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
PROOF OF STAKE ALLIANCE PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SENTILINK CORP. PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
TEMPLUM LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS OUISA CAPITAL LLC) PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
GLOBAL PRIMEX LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
WARRIOR TRADING PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SYNIVERSE TECHNOLOGIES LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SOUTHERN INSTITUTE OF POLICY RESEARCH SOUTHERN INSTITUTE OF POLICY RESEARCH undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Gregorio Casar, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us