H.R. 9220

H.R. 9220: To amend title 10, United States Code, to modify the treatment of nondisclosure agreements with respect to privatized military housing and to expand protection from retaliation against tenants of such housing, and for other purposes.

Introduced Sara Jacobs (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9220 aims to change how nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) are treated in privatized military housing. It seeks to enhance protections for tenants against retaliation when they report issues or concerns regarding their housing conditions. Essentially, the bill is designed to improve tenant rights and ensure that military families living in privatized housing can speak up without fear of negative consequences.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9220 have praised the bill for enhancing tenant protections and fostering a safer living environment for military families. They argue that it empowers residents to voice their concerns about housing quality and management practices, ultimately leading to better living conditions and accountability from housing providers.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9220 have raised concerns about the potential for increased litigation and the burden it may place on housing providers. Some argue that the bill could complicate the relationship between tenants and management, potentially leading to misunderstandings and conflicts rather than resolving issues effectively.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$315,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The bill H.R. 9220 focuses on modifying nondisclosure agreements related to privatized military housing and expanding tenant protections. The top donor industries for sponsor Sara Jacobs include Health Professionals and Retired individuals, with no direct overlap with the subject matter of the bill. This lack of direct industry connection suggests a low risk of conflict of interest. The total contributions from these donor industries amount to $315 million, but they do not pertain to military housing or tenant rights, indicating that the financial influence is unlikely to skew the legislative intent of the bill. Additionally, while there is significant lobbying activity in the policy area, the undisclosed nature of these activities makes it difficult to ascertain direct connections to Jacobs' donors.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY RMP STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
MANAGED FUNDS ASSOCIATION RMP STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
PUBLIC PRIVATE STRATEGIES VALENTINE STRATEGIES undisclosed
SAMSARA INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. undisclosed
OTG PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
BLOCKQUAKE HOLDINGS LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
PAYSAFE MERCHANT SERVICES CORPORATION PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
PROOF OF STAKE ALLIANCE PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SENTILINK CORP. PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
TEMPLUM LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS OUISA CAPITAL LLC) PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
GLOBAL PRIMEX LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
WARRIOR TRADING PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SYNIVERSE TECHNOLOGIES LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SOUTHERN INSTITUTE OF POLICY RESEARCH SOUTHERN INSTITUTE OF POLICY RESEARCH undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Sara Jacobs, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us