H.R. 9470

H.R. 9470: To ensure the privacy of pregnancy termination or loss information under the HIPAA privacy regulations and the HITECH Act.

Introduced Sara Jacobs (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9470 aims to protect the privacy of individuals' health information related to pregnancy termination or loss by amending the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) privacy regulations and the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act. This legislation seeks to ensure that sensitive medical information concerning pregnancy-related decisions is kept confidential and not disclosed without consent.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9470 have praised the bill for strengthening patient privacy rights, particularly in sensitive areas concerning reproductive health. Advocacy groups have highlighted the importance of protecting individuals from potential stigma and discrimination that may arise from the disclosure of pregnancy termination or loss information.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9470 argue that while privacy is important, the bill may create barriers to necessary medical communication and data sharing among healthcare providers. Some have raised concerns that overly strict privacy protections could hinder public health efforts and limit access to vital information for healthcare professionals.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Health

While there are no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries, the lobbying activity in the policy area raises some concerns. Notably, RESPOND-US, which contributed $140,000, is involved in lobbying efforts that could intersect with privacy and healthcare regulations. Additionally, GINKGO BIOWORKS, INC. contributed $60,000, and their involvement in biotechnology could relate to healthcare data privacy. Although these contributions do not directly correlate with the bill's focus on pregnancy termination privacy, they suggest a broader interest in healthcare regulations that could influence legislative priorities. Voters should be aware of these connections as they may indicate potential influences on the bill's outcomes.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
RESPOND-US CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $140,000
SILVERLINING ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $80,000
MEDLINE CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $80,000
GINKGO BIOWORKS, INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $60,000
AMERICAN FLOOD COALITION ACTION INC ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $60,000
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $50,000
LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $50,000
MERIDIAM INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $40,000
LEO TECHNOLOGIES BUTLER SNOW LLP $30,000
MAXIMUS BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
JOHNSON & JOHNSON BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION GTB PARTNERS $20,000
CHAMBERS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUTLER SNOW LLP $15,000
HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION $15,000
BASIS PATH BUTLER SNOW LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Sara Jacobs, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us