H.R. 9225

H.R. 9225: To require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to conduct a study to assess whether certain aircraft certified under part 23 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, may be used in operations conducted under part 121 of s

Introduced Tracey Mann (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9225 requires the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to conduct a study to evaluate if certain aircraft, which are certified under part 23 of the Federal Aviation Regulations, can be utilized in commercial operations governed by part 121. This could potentially allow for a broader range of aircraft to be used in commercial passenger and cargo services.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9225 argue that the bill could enhance the efficiency of the aviation industry by expanding the types of aircraft that can be used for commercial operations. Proponents believe this could lead to increased competition and lower costs for consumers, as well as improved access to air travel in underserved regions.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9225 express concerns about safety implications, suggesting that allowing more aircraft types into commercial operations could compromise passenger safety. There are worries that the study may overlook important regulatory standards that ensure the reliability and safety of aircraft in commercial service.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Transportation and Public Works

While there are no direct industry overlaps detected between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries, the lobbying activity in the aviation and healthcare sectors raises some concerns. Notably, Intermountain Health contributed $50,000 and Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated contributed $60,000, both through lobbying firms. Although these contributions do not directly relate to aviation, they indicate a significant financial interest in federal regulations that could affect their operations. Voters should be aware that while the bill aims to assess aircraft certification, the financial influence of healthcare and infrastructure sectors could indirectly impact the outcomes of such studies.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED MARSHALL & POPP, LLC $60,000
SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC. MARSHALL & POPP, LLC $60,000
INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTH MCDERMOTT WILL & SCHULTE LLP $50,000
WAYFINDER GROUP (OBO RESEARCH CORPORATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII) RED MAPLE CONSULTING, LLC $40,000
FRONTIER INFRASTRUCTURE HOLDINGS LLC KOUNTOUPES DENHAM CARR & REID, LLC $30,000
ECKERD CONNECTS KOUNTOUPES DENHAM CARR & REID, LLC $30,000
SMART APPROACHES TO MARIJUANA OFF HILL STRATEGIES L.L.C. $20,000
FEDERATION OF ELECTRIC POWER COS OF JAPAN GEORGE H. DENISON $10,000
MAYO CLINIC MCDERMOTT WILL & SCHULTE LLP undisclosed
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed
THE BIG TEN CONFERENCE, INC. MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed
THE BIG 12 CONFERENCE, INC. MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed
SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed
PAC-12 CONFERENCE MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed
ATLANTIC COAST CONFERENCE MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Tracey Mann, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us