H.R. 9249 aims to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act by placing restrictions on the approval of immigrant petitions for individuals who have previously worked for entities identified on the Department of Defense's 1260H list. This list includes organizations that have been flagged for various reasons, potentially impacting the ability of certain foreign workers to gain immigrant status in the U.S.
Supporters of H.R. 9249 argue that the bill enhances national security by ensuring that individuals with ties to potentially problematic entities are scrutinized more closely before being allowed to immigrate. Proponents believe this measure is a necessary step to protect American interests and maintain the integrity of the immigration system.
Critics of H.R. 9249 contend that the bill unfairly targets individuals who may have been employed by legitimate businesses on the Department of Defense's list, potentially denying them opportunities for a better life in the U.S. They argue that the legislation could lead to unjust outcomes for workers who had no control over the actions of their employers and could exacerbate labor shortages in certain sectors.
While there are no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the subject matter of H.R. 9249, the lobbying activity in the immigration policy area raises some concerns. Notably, the American Subcontractor Association, which contributed $30,000, may have interests in labor-related immigration policies, potentially influencing the bill's direction. Additionally, the American Council of Independent Laboratories, which donated $20,000, could also have vested interests in the employment of foreign workers in specialized fields. This indirect connection suggests a medium level of risk for conflicts of interest, as these organizations may advocate for policies that align with their financial interests rather than the broader public good.
Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.
| Client | Lobbying Firm | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | $30,000 |
| FCA INTERNATIONAL | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | $20,000 |
| FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID ATLANTIC REGION | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | $15,000 |
| STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 420 | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | $12,000 |
| MONROE ENERGY, LLC | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | $10,000 |
| UPSTATE NIAGARA COOPERATIVE, INC. | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | $10,000 |
| AGRI-MARK, INC | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | $10,000 |
| LABOR & ENERGY ALLIANCE | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | undisclosed |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS MIDDLE TENNESSEE | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | undisclosed |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | undisclosed |
| EKLUTNA, INC | EKLUTNA, INC. | undisclosed |
| CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | undisclosed |
| NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION - PENN-DEL-JERSEY CHAPTER | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | undisclosed |
| INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF DRILLING CONTRACTORS | INTERNATIONAL ASSOCATION OF DRILLING CONTRACTORS | undisclosed |
Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026
Top industries funding John Moolenaar, ranked by total contributions.
Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)
