H.R. 9271

H.R. 9271: To authorize sitting Governors to conduct health and safety oversight inspections of immigration detention facilities located within their states, and to establish a reporting mechanism to Congress on conditions found therein.

Introduced Adriano Espaillat (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9271 is a bill that allows current Governors of U.S. states to perform health and safety inspections at immigration detention facilities located in their states. The bill also establishes a system for these Governors to report their findings to Congress regarding the conditions of these facilities.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9271 argue that it empowers state leaders to ensure the health and safety of individuals in immigration detention facilities. They believe that local oversight can lead to improved conditions and accountability, addressing concerns about the treatment of detainees.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9271 express concerns that the bill may lead to inconsistencies in inspections across states and could politicize the oversight of immigration facilities. They argue that it might undermine federal standards and create confusion about jurisdiction and authority.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Immigration

The analysis of H.R. 9271, sponsored by Adriano Espaillat, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. The bill focuses on health and safety oversight of immigration detention facilities, while the top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in immigration or detention facility operations. The lobbying activity associated with this bill includes contributions from various organizations, but these do not directly correlate to the bill's focus. For instance, Upstate Niagara Cooperative, Inc. and Agri-Mark, Inc. contributed $10,000 each, yet their industries are not related to immigration or detention oversight. Thus, the potential for conflicts of interest remains low as there is no evident financial incentive for the sponsor's donors to influence this legislation.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $30,000
FCA INTERNATIONAL OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $25,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID ATLANTIC REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $15,000
STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 420 OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $12,000
UPSTATE NIAGARA COOPERATIVE, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
AGRI-MARK, INC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
3STRANDS GLOBAL FOUNDATION ASCEND CONSULTING $10,000
CHRISTIAN CAMP AND CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION ASCEND CONSULTING $10,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS MIDDLE TENNESSEE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
EKLUTNA, INC EKLUTNA, INC. undisclosed
CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION - PENN-DEL-JERSEY CHAPTER OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF DRILLING CONTRACTORS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCATION OF DRILLING CONTRACTORS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Adriano Espaillat, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us