H.R. 9351

H.R. 9351: To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to provide relief for members of the uniformed services who homeschool their dependent children, and for other purposes.

Introduced Pat Harrigan (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9351 aims to amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to offer specific relief provisions for members of the uniformed services who choose to homeschool their dependent children. This may include protections or benefits that support military families in managing their educational responsibilities while serving in the military.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9351 have praised the bill for recognizing the unique challenges faced by military families, particularly those who homeschool. They argue that it provides essential support that can help ensure that children of servicemembers receive a quality education, even amidst the demands of military life.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9351 express concerns that the bill may create disparities in educational standards or funding for homeschooled children compared to those in traditional school settings. Some worry that it could lead to a lack of oversight in homeschooling practices, potentially affecting the quality of education for these children.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The analysis of H.R. 9351 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Pat Harrigan's top donors and the bill's subject matter, which focuses on providing relief for servicemembers who homeschool their children. The top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in the homeschooling or education sector, which reduces the likelihood of conflicts of interest. Furthermore, the lobbying activity in this policy area predominantly involves organizations related to healthcare and local government initiatives, with no clear connection to education or homeschooling. The total lobbying amounts from these organizations, such as the American College of Clinical Pharmacy at $144,981, do not indicate a direct influence on the bill's objectives, suggesting that the risk of conflict is minimal.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY $144,981
ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) $40,000
CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION $40,000
GOTRIANGLE MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) $30,000
AFRICAN AMERICAN ALLIANCE OF CDFI CEOS MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) $20,000
BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB ALEXANDER J. BECKLES, L.L.C. $20,000
CITY OF GLADEWATER, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC $12,000
CITY OF CRANDALL, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC $10,000
CITY OF JUSTIN, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC $10,000
THE LIVINGSTON GROUP ON BEHALF OF INNOVATIVE VACCINE TECHNOLOGIES MAGILL ASSOCIATES, LLC undisclosed
OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF AMERICA, INC. MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) undisclosed
LUMBEE TRIBE HOLDINGS, INC. MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) undisclosed
CITY OF CLEVELAND, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC undisclosed
CITY OF RIO HONDO, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC undisclosed
HOWARD COUNTY, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Pat Harrigan, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us