H.R. 9359

H.R. 9359: To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to provide for the reissuance to households of supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits to replace benefits stolen by identity theft or typical skimming practices, and for other purposes.

Introduced Grace Meng (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9359 aims to amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to allow households to receive replacement Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits if their benefits have been stolen through identity theft or skimming practices. This legislation seeks to ensure that individuals and families do not suffer food insecurity due to fraudulent activities that compromise their benefits.

Positive Media Summary

Media coverage has highlighted the bill as a necessary response to the increasing incidents of fraud affecting vulnerable populations. Advocates for food security have praised the legislation for protecting low-income households from the repercussions of theft, emphasizing that it could help maintain access to essential nutrition for those in need.

Negative Media Summary

Some critics argue that the bill may not adequately address the root causes of fraud and could lead to increased costs for the SNAP program. Concerns have also been raised about the potential for abuse of the reissuance process, which could undermine the integrity of the program.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Committee
UNKNOWN

The analysis of H.R. 9359, sponsored by Grace Meng, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and her top donor industries. The primary focus of the bill is to amend the Food and Nutrition Act to address issues related to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, specifically in cases of identity theft and skimming. Meng's top donor industries include Health Professionals, contributing a substantial $120 million, and Retired individuals at $37.5 million, neither of which have a direct connection to the food and nutrition sector. This lack of overlap suggests that there are minimal financial incentives influencing the legislation from her major donors. Voters should be aware that while large donations can raise questions about potential conflicts, in this case, the absence of relevant industry ties indicates a low risk of conflict of interest.

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Grace Meng, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us