H.R. 9486

H.R. 9486: To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to increase transparency of group health plan data, prevent discrimination, and for other purposes.

Introduced Mark Takano (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9486 aims to amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to enhance transparency regarding group health plan data. The bill seeks to prevent discrimination in health plan coverage and may include provisions to ensure that all individuals have fair access to health benefits without bias based on factors such as health status or demographic information.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9486 have praised the bill for its potential to increase transparency in health care, arguing that clearer data on group health plans will empower consumers and promote fair treatment across different demographics. Advocates believe that reducing discrimination in health coverage is a crucial step toward equity in healthcare access.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9486 have raised concerns about the feasibility of implementing the proposed transparency measures, suggesting that they could lead to increased administrative burdens for employers and insurers. Some opponents argue that the bill may not effectively address the root causes of discrimination in health plans and could result in unintended consequences.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Health

While there are no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries, the lobbying activity in the healthcare sector raises some potential concerns. Notably, the 'Committee to Protect Health Care' has an undisclosed amount of lobbying, which could indicate significant interests in the bill's outcomes. Additionally, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, which contributed $810,990, may have interests that intersect with healthcare policy, although not directly related to the bill's transparency focus. Overall, the lack of direct donor overlap suggests a lower risk, but the presence of substantial lobbying dollars in the healthcare space warrants attention.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE $810,990
AMERICAN LEGION THE AMERICAN LEGION $190,000
ACADEMY OF MODEL AERONAUTICS CAPITOL HILL POLICY GROUP LLC $50,000
CALISTA CORPORATION CAPITOL HILL POLICY GROUP LLC $50,000
POLARIS CONSULTING ROCK CREEK COUNSEL $40,000
TELESAT GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS VELOS $40,000
NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ROCK CREEK COUNSEL $40,000
PUGET SOUND ENERGY ROCK CREEK COUNSEL $30,000
KOOTENAI TRIBE OF IDAHO CAPITOL HILL POLICY GROUP LLC $20,000
MICRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. OFF HILL STRATEGIES L.L.C. $20,000
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS INC BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS, INC. $10,000
TERAMIND, INC. (ON BEHALF OF GROISMAN, LLC) EJK, LLC $5,000
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT HEALTH CARE COMMITTEE TO PROTECT HEALTH CARE undisclosed
INTELSAT GENERAL CORPORATION VELOS undisclosed
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Mark Takano, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $600,000,000
Individuals: $600,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $187,500,000
Individuals: $187,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us