H.R. 9532

H.R. 9532: To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit group health plan payment clawbacks in certain circumstances.

Introduced Ritchie Torres (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9532 aims to amend the Social Security Act to prevent group health plans from reclaiming payments made to healthcare providers under specific circumstances. This legislation is intended to protect healthcare providers from unexpected financial losses due to payment clawbacks.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9532 argue that it provides essential protections for healthcare providers, ensuring that they receive fair compensation for their services without the risk of retroactive payment adjustments. This bill is seen as a step towards stabilizing the financial relationships between healthcare providers and insurance companies, ultimately benefiting patient care.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9532 express concerns that the bill may lead to increased costs for group health plans, potentially resulting in higher premiums for consumers. Some analysts suggest that while the intention to protect providers is commendable, the long-term financial implications could negatively impact the overall healthcare system.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Health

The analysis of H.R. 9532, which aims to amend the Social Security Act regarding health plan payment clawbacks, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor, Ritchie Torres's top donor industries. The lobbying activity related to healthcare includes significant contributions from organizations like the American Israel Public Affairs Committee ($810,990) and the Committee to Protect Health Care, although the latter's amount is undisclosed. However, these contributions do not directly correlate with the specific provisions of the bill, which focuses on payment practices rather than broader healthcare funding or policy changes. Therefore, while there is lobbying activity in the healthcare sector, the lack of direct donor overlap suggests a low risk of conflict of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE $810,990
AMERICAN LEGION THE AMERICAN LEGION $190,000
ACADEMY OF MODEL AERONAUTICS CAPITOL HILL POLICY GROUP LLC $50,000
CALISTA CORPORATION CAPITOL HILL POLICY GROUP LLC $50,000
POLARIS CONSULTING ROCK CREEK COUNSEL $40,000
TELESAT GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS VELOS $40,000
NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ROCK CREEK COUNSEL $40,000
PUGET SOUND ENERGY ROCK CREEK COUNSEL $30,000
KOOTENAI TRIBE OF IDAHO CAPITOL HILL POLICY GROUP LLC $20,000
MICRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. OFF HILL STRATEGIES L.L.C. $20,000
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS INC BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS, INC. $10,000
TERAMIND, INC. (ON BEHALF OF GROISMAN, LLC) EJK, LLC $5,000
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT HEALTH CARE COMMITTEE TO PROTECT HEALTH CARE undisclosed
INTELSAT GENERAL CORPORATION VELOS undisclosed
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Ritchie Torres, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us