S. 4650

S. 4650: A bill to amend the Plant Protection Act to improve plant pest and disease preparedness for specialty crops.

Introduced Adam Schiff (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4650 is a bill that aims to enhance the preparedness and response to plant pests and diseases that specifically affect specialty crops. This legislation seeks to amend the Plant Protection Act to better equip farmers and agricultural stakeholders to manage and mitigate risks associated with plant health threats.

Positive Media Summary

Media coverage has highlighted the importance of S. 4650 in supporting specialty crop farmers, emphasizing that improved pest and disease preparedness can lead to increased agricultural productivity and economic stability in the sector. Supporters argue that this bill is a proactive step towards safeguarding food security and protecting valuable crops.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4650 have raised concerns about the potential for increased regulatory burdens on farmers and the cost implications of implementing new pest management strategies. Some media outlets have questioned whether the bill adequately addresses the root causes of plant health issues or if it merely serves as a temporary fix without long-term solutions.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Agriculture and Food

The analysis of Bill S. 4650, which aims to amend the Plant Protection Act for specialty crops, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Adam Schiff's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The lobbying activity related to this bill includes contributions from various entities, such as Summit Works USA ($20,000) and Monroe Energy, LLC ($10,000), but these do not appear to directly influence the agricultural sector as it pertains to plant pest and disease preparedness. The absence of significant financial ties to the bill's focus suggests that potential conflicts of interest are minimal. Voters should be aware that while there is lobbying activity, it does not indicate a direct financial interest in the specific legislative changes proposed.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $30,000
SUMMIT WORKS USA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID ATLANTIC REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $15,000
MONROE ENERGY, LLC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
UPSTATE NIAGARA COOPERATIVE, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
AGRI-MARK, INC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
FRIENDS OF FATHER JUDGE HIGH SCHOOL, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $6,000
ARSENAL ASSOCIATES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
LABOR & ENERGY ALLIANCE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS MIDDLE TENNESSEE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
EKLUTNA, INC EKLUTNA, INC. undisclosed
CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION - PENN-DEL-JERSEY CHAPTER OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Adam Schiff, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $80,000,000
Individuals: $80,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $25,000,000
Individuals: $25,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us