S. 4655

S. 4655: A bill to allow the Farm Credit Administration the option to examine low-risk Farm Credit System institutions under a 24-month cycle.

Introduced John Cornyn (R) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4655 is a bill that gives the Farm Credit Administration the option to examine low-risk institutions within the Farm Credit System every 24 months instead of more frequently. This change is aimed at easing the regulatory burden on institutions that are considered low-risk.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4655 argue that the bill will reduce unnecessary regulatory burdens on stable, low-risk Farm Credit System institutions, allowing them to focus more on serving farmers and ranchers. Proponents believe this will enhance operational efficiency and promote financial stability within the agricultural sector.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4655 express concern that extending the examination cycle for low-risk institutions may lead to complacency and a lack of oversight, potentially allowing financial issues to go unnoticed. They argue that regular examinations are crucial for maintaining the integrity and stability of the Farm Credit System.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$735,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Agriculture and Food

The analysis of bill S. 4655, which pertains to the Farm Credit Administration's examination cycles for low-risk institutions, reveals no direct industry overlaps with the sponsor Senator John Cornyn's top donor industries. His primary donors are from the health professionals sector, contributing $560 million, and the retired sector, contributing $175 million. Given that the bill focuses on agricultural finance rather than healthcare or retirement issues, the potential for conflicts of interest appears minimal. Additionally, while there is lobbying activity in the policy area, the connections to the bill's subject matter remain tenuous, as the lobbying firms involved do not directly correlate with the interests of Cornyn's top donors. Voters should be aware that while there are substantial contributions from health professionals, they do not influence this specific agricultural bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION $1,000,000
CEDIA CEDIA $120,000
HEARTFLOW, INC. HEARTFLOW, INC. $90,000
KNOA PHARMA LLC MERCURY PUBLIC AFFAIRS, LLC undisclosed
HELIX DEFENSE CROSS POTOMAC CONSULTING LLC undisclosed
SUR HOLDINGS BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
GLOBAL KRATOM COALITION BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER, LLP ON BEHALF OF CURATIVE INC. BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
ORCA BIO BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
IONQ, INC. IONQ, INC. undisclosed
LIFE360 EMERGENT STRATEGIES undisclosed
ZILLOW BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
TWENTY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. THE COMPLETE AGENCY undisclosed
CULTURAL CARE INC. KEEFE STRATEGIES LLC FKA KEEFE SINGISER PARTNERS undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FORENSIC NURSES POLSINELLI PC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding John Cornyn, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $560,000,000
Individuals: $560,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $175,000,000
Individuals: $175,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us