S. 4705

S. 4705: A bill to prohibit Federal funds from being used for certain legal financial settlements, to provide funding for the supplemental nutrition assistance program, and for other purposes.

Introduced Jacky Rosen (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4705 is a bill that aims to prevent federal funds from being used for specific legal financial settlements. Additionally, it seeks to allocate funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which assists low-income individuals and families in purchasing food. The bill may also contain other provisions related to these topics.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4705 have praised the bill for its focus on redirecting federal funds to essential programs like SNAP, which helps combat food insecurity among vulnerable populations. Advocates argue that the bill reflects a commitment to using taxpayer money for the public good rather than legal settlements.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4705 have expressed concerns that the prohibition on using federal funds for legal settlements may undermine the ability of individuals and groups to seek justice and compensation in legal disputes. Some have argued that the bill could limit accountability for federal agencies and reduce the effectiveness of legal recourse.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Agriculture and Food

The analysis of bill S. 4705, sponsored by Jacky Rosen, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. The bill addresses the prohibition of Federal funds for certain legal financial settlements and provides funding for the supplemental nutrition assistance program. The lobbying activity related to this bill includes various organizations, but the contributions from these groups do not directly correlate with the bill's objectives. For instance, Monroe Energy, LLC contributed $10,000, and Upstate Niagara Cooperative, Inc. also contributed $10,000, but neither appears to have a direct stake in the provisions of this bill. Therefore, the potential for conflicts of interest is minimal, as the financial support does not align with the legislative intent of the bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $30,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID ATLANTIC REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $15,000
STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 420 OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $12,000
MONROE ENERGY, LLC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
UPSTATE NIAGARA COOPERATIVE, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
AGRI-MARK, INC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
FRIENDS OF FATHER JUDGE HIGH SCHOOL, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $6,000
ARSENAL ASSOCIATES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
LABOR & ENERGY ALLIANCE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS MIDDLE TENNESSEE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
EKLUTNA, INC EKLUTNA, INC. undisclosed
CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION - PENN-DEL-JERSEY CHAPTER OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Jacky Rosen, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $1,440,000,000
Individuals: $1,440,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $450,000,000
Individuals: $450,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us