S. 4753

S. 4753: A bill to repeal the requirements of the Foreign Dredge Act of 1906 with respect to dredging and dredged material.

Introduced Mike Lee (R) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4753 is a bill that seeks to repeal the requirements set by the Foreign Dredge Act of 1906, which regulates dredging activities and the management of dredged materials in the United States. By repealing these requirements, the bill would potentially allow for more flexibility in dredging operations without the constraints imposed by the 1906 Act.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4753 argue that repealing outdated regulations will streamline the dredging process, promote economic development, and enhance infrastructure projects. They believe that modernizing these regulations can improve efficiency and reduce costs for companies involved in dredging and related activities.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4753 express concerns that repealing the Foreign Dredge Act could lead to environmental degradation and insufficient oversight of dredging practices. They warn that removing these regulations may harm aquatic ecosystems and undermine efforts to manage dredged materials responsibly.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Transportation and Public Works

The analysis of bill S. 4753, which seeks to repeal the requirements of the Foreign Dredge Act of 1906, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Mike Lee's top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill. While there is significant lobbying activity in related areas, such as healthcare and marine mammal parks, these do not directly correlate with dredging activities. The total lobbying contributions in this policy area amount to $220,000, but they are from industries that do not have a clear financial interest in dredging regulations. Therefore, the potential for conflicts of interest appears minimal. Voters should note that while there is lobbying present, it does not seem to influence the specific legislative intent of this bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
OSF HEALTHCARE SYSTEM OSF HEALTHCARE SYSTEM $60,000
EGAN-JONES RATINGS COMPANY INVARIANT LLC $50,000
GRADIUM MEGA COIN HARTWELL CAPITOL CONSULTING $50,000
DRAI HEALTH HARTWELL CAPITOL CONSULTING $50,000
VALTHOS INC. INVARIANT LLC $40,000
SANDY BAY PARTNERS, LLC GRACE BAY STRATEGIES, LLC $20,000
ORGANOGENESIS DONOVAN STRATEGIES LLC $15,000
ANTENNA RESEARCH ASSOCIATES DONOVAN STRATEGIES LLC $15,000
NETSCOUT DONOVAN STRATEGIES LLC $10,000
ALLLIANCE OF MARINE MAMMAL PARKS AND AQUARIUMS MEA STRATEGIES LLC undisclosed
REGIONAL FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT GROUP COALITION ALL OF THE ABOVE CONSULTING, LLC undisclosed
JACKSON WALKER LLP ON BEHALF OF SAN MIGUEL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
ANTHEIA INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
RAILROAD INVESTIGATION PROJECT GROUP EAGLE 1 RESOURCES, LCC undisclosed
EAGLE 1 RESOURCES, LCC EAGLE 1 RESOURCES, LCC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Mike Lee, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $600,000,000
Individuals: $600,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $187,500,000
Individuals: $187,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us