S. 4769

S. 4769: A bill to double the civil penalties for aliens who enter or attempt to enter the United States without authorization, aliens subject to a final order of removal who fail or refuse to depart from the United States, and employers that knowingly h

Introduced Rick Scott (R) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4769 proposes to increase the civil penalties imposed on individuals who enter or attempt to enter the United States without authorization. It also aims to double the penalties for those who are subject to a final order of removal and do not leave the country, as well as for employers who knowingly hire unauthorized workers.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4769 argue that increasing penalties will deter illegal immigration and encourage compliance with U.S. immigration laws. They believe that stricter enforcement is necessary to protect American jobs and uphold the rule of law.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4769 contend that doubling penalties may lead to increased hardship for vulnerable populations and could exacerbate the challenges faced by undocumented immigrants. They argue that the bill focuses too heavily on punitive measures rather than addressing the root causes of immigration and may negatively impact employer-employee relationships.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Immigration

The analysis of bill S. 4769, which aims to double civil penalties for unauthorized entry into the U.S., reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Rick Scott's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The lobbying activity associated with this bill includes contributions from various organizations, but none appear to directly influence the immigration enforcement policies outlined in the bill. Notably, the American Subcontractor Association contributed $30,000, which may have indirect implications regarding labor and immigration, but does not constitute a direct conflict. Overall, the absence of direct financial ties to industries that would benefit from the bill suggests a low risk of conflict of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $30,000
STREET GRACE ASCEND CONSULTING $30,000
FCA INTERNATIONAL OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $25,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID ATLANTIC REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $15,000
STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 420 OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $12,000
UPSTATE NIAGARA COOPERATIVE, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
AGRI-MARK, INC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
3STRANDS GLOBAL FOUNDATION ASCEND CONSULTING $10,000
CHRISTIAN CAMP AND CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION ASCEND CONSULTING $10,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
EKLUTNA, INC EKLUTNA, INC. undisclosed
CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION - PENN-DEL-JERSEY CHAPTER OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF DRILLING CONTRACTORS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCATION OF DRILLING CONTRACTORS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Rick Scott, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $360,000,000
Individuals: $360,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $112,500,000
Individuals: $112,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us