S. 4772

S. 4772: A bill to prohibit States and local governments from prohibiting or limiting the connection, reconnection, modification, installation, transportation, distribution, or expansion of a renewable energy service based on the type or source of energy

Introduced Jeff Merkley (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4772 is a bill that aims to prevent states and local governments from imposing restrictions on renewable energy services. This includes prohibiting or limiting activities related to the connection, reconnection, modification, installation, transportation, distribution, or expansion of renewable energy sources, regardless of their type or origin.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4772 highlight its potential to accelerate the transition to renewable energy by removing bureaucratic hurdles. They argue that the bill promotes energy independence, job creation in the green sector, and environmental sustainability, receiving praise from environmental groups and renewable energy advocates.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4772 express concerns that the bill undermines local governance and decision-making. They argue that it could lead to conflicts between state and local priorities, potentially disregarding community needs and preferences regarding energy sources. Some local governments fear losing control over energy policies that directly affect their constituents.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Energy

The analysis of bill S. 4772, which aims to prohibit states and local governments from limiting renewable energy services, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Jeff Merkley's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. While there are several lobbying activities in the renewable energy sector, the disclosed amounts from these entities do not indicate a direct financial influence on the bill itself. For instance, Green Oceans contributed $22,500, Shanda Asset Management LLC contributed $50,000, and the Spray Foam Coalition contributed $60,000, but these contributions are not directly linked to Merkley's top donors. Therefore, the risk of conflict of interest appears minimal, as the financial interests of the sponsors' donors do not align with the provisions of the bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SPRAY FOAM COALITION SPRAY FOAM COALITION $60,000
SHANDA ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC SHANDA ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC $50,000
GREEN OCEANS EDNEXUS ADVISORS, LLC $22,500
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP undisclosed
RIDE GROUP LLC AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD undisclosed
CRESCENTA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CAPITOL CORE GROUP, INC. undisclosed
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP undisclosed
SPACECONNECT ASSOCIATION SALT POINT STRATEGIES undisclosed
CURIUM US LLC CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. undisclosed
TWINZA OIL LIMITED ANCHOR GROUP LLC undisclosed
PUBLIC PRIVATE STRATEGIES VALENTINE STRATEGIES undisclosed
PELICAN ENERGY PARTNERS LP CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. undisclosed
CORVUS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Jeff Merkley, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $520,000,000
Individuals: $520,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $162,500,000
Individuals: $162,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us