S. 4806

S. 4806: A bill to clarify that the interconnection of large load facilities directly to facilities used for the transmission of electric energy in interstate commerce is a matter within the jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

Introduced Cynthia Lummis (R) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4806 is a bill aimed at establishing that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has the authority to oversee the interconnection of large load facilities—such as industrial operations or data centers—directly to the electric transmission systems that operate across state lines. This clarification is intended to streamline regulatory processes and ensure that large energy consumers can connect to the grid more efficiently.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4806 argue that the bill will enhance the efficiency of energy distribution and promote economic growth by allowing large energy consumers to connect to the interstate electric grid more easily. Proponents believe that this will lead to increased investment in infrastructure and support the transition to cleaner energy sources.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4806 express concerns that the bill could undermine state regulatory authority and lead to potential negative impacts on local energy markets. Some fear that prioritizing large load facilities may disadvantage smaller energy providers and disrupt existing agreements, potentially leading to higher costs for consumers.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Energy

The analysis of bill S. 4806, which pertains to the jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission over the interconnection of large load facilities, shows no direct overlaps between the sponsor Cynthia Lummis's top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill. The top donor industries do not include any entities directly involved in energy transmission or regulation, which minimizes the risk of conflicts of interest. Additionally, while there is lobbying activity in the energy sector, the amounts contributed by these entities are relatively modest compared to the overall campaign finance landscape, with the highest contribution being $60,000 from OSF Healthcare System, which is unrelated to energy transmission. Therefore, the potential for conflicts of interest appears limited.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
OSF HEALTHCARE SYSTEM OSF HEALTHCARE SYSTEM $60,000
EGAN-JONES RATINGS COMPANY INVARIANT LLC $50,000
GRADIUM MEGA COIN HARTWELL CAPITOL CONSULTING $50,000
DRAI HEALTH HARTWELL CAPITOL CONSULTING $50,000
VALTHOS INC. INVARIANT LLC $40,000
SANDY BAY PARTNERS, LLC GRACE BAY STRATEGIES, LLC $20,000
ORGANOGENESIS DONOVAN STRATEGIES LLC $15,000
ANTENNA RESEARCH ASSOCIATES DONOVAN STRATEGIES LLC $15,000
NETSCOUT DONOVAN STRATEGIES LLC $10,000
ALLLIANCE OF MARINE MAMMAL PARKS AND AQUARIUMS MEA STRATEGIES LLC undisclosed
REGIONAL FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT GROUP COALITION ALL OF THE ABOVE CONSULTING, LLC undisclosed
JACKSON WALKER LLP ON BEHALF OF SAN MIGUEL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
ANTHEIA INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
RAILROAD INVESTIGATION PROJECT GROUP EAGLE 1 RESOURCES, LCC undisclosed
EAGLE 1 RESOURCES, LCC EAGLE 1 RESOURCES, LCC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Cynthia Lummis, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us