S. 4823

S. 4823: A bill to amend the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 to include quantum information science and technology in the areas covered by the Program on China and Transformational Exports.

Introduced Andy Kim (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The bill, titled S. 4823, aims to update the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 by expanding the scope of the Program on China and Transformational Exports to include quantum information science and technology. This suggests a focus on supporting U.S. exports in the emerging field of quantum technology, particularly in relation to competition with China.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of the bill argue that including quantum information science and technology in the Export-Import Bank's mandate will enhance U.S. competitiveness in a critical technological area. They believe this move could foster innovation and secure American leadership in quantum technologies, which are seen as vital for national security and economic growth.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of the bill express concerns that it may further escalate tensions with China and lead to a tech arms race. Some worry that prioritizing quantum technology exports could divert resources from other important sectors and that the bill does not adequately address the ethical implications of quantum technologies.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Foreign Trade and International Finance

The analysis of bill S. 4823, which aims to amend the Export-Import Bank Act to include quantum information science and technology, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Andy Kim's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The lobbying activity in this policy area includes various organizations, but none appear to have a direct financial interest in quantum information science and technology. The largest lobbying expenditure comes from the Port of New Orleans at $130,000, which does not relate to the bill's focus on quantum technology. Therefore, the potential for conflicts of interest is minimal, as the financial contributions from sponsors do not align with the bill's objectives.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
CRYPTO COUNCIL FOR INNOVATION CRYPTO COUNCIL FOR INNOVATION $310,000
PORT OF NEW ORLEANS (PORT NOLA) SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS $130,000
RPM INTERNATIONAL INC THE CJR GROUP, INC. $40,000
LA MAESTRA FOUNDATION ON BEHALF OF LA MAESTRA FAMILY CLINIC, INC. SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS $20,000
JEFFERSON PARISH CORONER'S OFFICE ADAMS AND REESE, LLP $20,000
GREENVILLE WATER SYSTEM ADAMS AND REESE, LLP $20,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR OILHEAT RESEARCH AND EDUCATION SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS $10,000
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY THE CJR GROUP, INC. $10,000
BELLEFAIRE JCB THE CJR GROUP, INC. $10,000
TERADAR BELTWAY GUIDED STRATEGIES $7,500
NATIONAL PARENTS UNION ACTION FUND INC. NATIONAL PARENTS UNION ACTION FUND INC. undisclosed
METABANK SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS undisclosed
MEAB SAL SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS undisclosed
M1 GROUP SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS undisclosed
US-INDIA STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP FORUM, INC. US-INDIA STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP FORUM, INC. undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Andy Kim, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us