Family law: child custody; factors determining best interest of child; include equal time with both parents as a factor. Amends secs. 3 & 5 of 1970 PA 91 (MCL 722.23 & 722.25). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5212'25, HB 5213'25

Michigan House Bill 5211 proposes amending the Child Custody Act to establish a legal presumption that equal or nearly equal parenting time between both parents is in a child's best interest during custody disputes. This presumption would apply unless a court finds clear and convincing evidence that equal time is not appropriate. The bill does not alter the existing "best interests of the child" standard but sets equal parenting time as the default starting point in custody cases between parents. It specifically applies to disputes between parents and does not affect cases involving agencies or third parties. ([myreptracker.com](https://www.myreptracker.com/michigan/bills/mi-2025-2026-regular-session-hb-5211?utm_source=openai))

Supporters of HB 5211 argue that the bill promotes shared parenting, aiming to ensure that children maintain strong relationships with both parents post-divorce or separation. They believe that equal parenting time can lead to better emotional and psychological outcomes for children. The bipartisan sponsorship of the bill suggests a collaborative effort to address child custody issues. ([legiscan.com](https://legiscan.com/MI/bill/HB5211/2025?utm_source=openai))

Critics of HB 5211 express concerns that the bill may not account for situations where equal parenting time is not in the child's best interest, such as cases involving domestic violence or substance abuse. They worry that the presumption of equal time could complicate custody decisions and potentially place children in unsafe environments. Additionally, some question whether the bill adequately considers the unique circumstances of each family. ([michiganvotes.org](https://www.michiganvotes.org/legislation/2025/house/bill-5211?utm_source=openai))