Crimes: criminal sexual conduct; penalties for criminal sexual conduct in the third degree; modify. Amends sec. 520d of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.520d).

Michigan House Bill 6262 seeks to amend the state's penal code by modifying the penalties for third-degree criminal sexual conduct. Specifically, it proposes increasing the minimum imprisonment term from 5 to 15 years, while maintaining the possibility of a life sentence. The bill also outlines various circumstances under which an individual can be charged with third-degree criminal sexual conduct, including cases involving victims aged 13 to 16, instances of force or coercion, and situations where the victim is mentally incapable, mentally incapacitated, or physically helpless. Additionally, the bill addresses offenses involving individuals related to the actor by blood or affinity to the third degree, as well as cases where the actor holds a position of authority over the victim, such as teachers or childcare providers. The bill was introduced on August 26, 2026, by Representatives Donni Steele, Alicia St. Germaine, Mark Tisdel, and Tom Kuhn, and has been referred to the House Judiciary Committee. ([legiscan.com](https://legiscan.com/MI/text/HB6262/2025?utm_source=openai))

While specific media coverage on Michigan House Bill 6262 is currently limited, the proposed increase in minimum sentencing for third-degree criminal sexual conduct is likely to be viewed positively by advocates for victims' rights and public safety. Strengthening penalties for such offenses is often seen as a commitment to holding perpetrators accountable and deterring future crimes. The bill's focus on various circumstances, including offenses involving minors and positions of authority, may also be appreciated for addressing complex dynamics in sexual misconduct cases.

Conversely, some critics might express concerns about the bill's potential impact on the criminal justice system. The significant increase in minimum sentencing could lead to debates about the effectiveness of longer prison terms in rehabilitating offenders and the potential for prison overcrowding. Additionally, questions may arise regarding the fairness and proportionality of sentences, particularly in cases where the circumstances of the offense vary widely. Without specific media coverage, these concerns remain speculative but are common in discussions about sentencing reforms.