H.Res. 1351

H.Res. 1351: Impeaching Eleanor Louise Ross, Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Introduced Andrew Clyde (R) HOUSE_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.Res. 1351 is a resolution that seeks to impeach Eleanor Louise Ross, who serves as a judge on the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The resolution accuses her of committing high crimes and misdemeanors, which is the constitutional standard for impeachment.

Positive Media Summary

Some media outlets may highlight this resolution as a necessary step to uphold judicial accountability and integrity, viewing it as a mechanism to address misconduct within the judiciary. Supporters might argue that such actions are vital for maintaining public trust in the legal system.

Negative Media Summary

Critics in the media may portray this resolution as a politically motivated attack on the judiciary, suggesting that it undermines the independence of the courts. Some may argue that it sets a dangerous precedent for using impeachment as a tool for partisan purposes rather than legitimate legal concerns.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Law

The bill H.Res. 1351, which seeks to impeach Judge Eleanor Louise Ross, does not show any direct industry overlaps with the top donor industries of the sponsor, Andrew Clyde. His top donors include Health Professionals and Retired individuals, contributing significant amounts of $120,000,000 and $37,500,000 respectively. Given that these industries are not directly related to judicial matters or the impeachment process, the potential for conflicts of interest appears minimal. Additionally, the lobbying activity associated with this bill's policy area is largely undisclosed, which complicates any further analysis of potential influences. However, without specific ties to the bill's subject matter, the risk remains low.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY RMP STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
MANAGED FUNDS ASSOCIATION RMP STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
PUBLIC PRIVATE STRATEGIES VALENTINE STRATEGIES undisclosed
SAMSARA INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. undisclosed
OTG PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
BLOCKQUAKE HOLDINGS LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
PAYSAFE MERCHANT SERVICES CORPORATION PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
PROOF OF STAKE ALLIANCE PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SENTILINK CORP. PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
TEMPLUM LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS OUISA CAPITAL LLC) PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
GLOBAL PRIMEX LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
WARRIOR TRADING PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SYNIVERSE TECHNOLOGIES LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SOUTHERN INSTITUTE OF POLICY RESEARCH SOUTHERN INSTITUTE OF POLICY RESEARCH undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Andrew Clyde, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us